28 July
2025
On Bees and Cell Phones, Again.
​​​​​​
Significant Behavioral Effects in Honey Bees Seven Days After Exposure to Commonly Used
Cellular Radiofrequencies ​

On June 11, 2025 biologists in the academic
journal Agriculture published scientific findings of significant behavioral effects in honey bees following exposure to radiofrequency radiation in the 900 MHz range, one of the most commonly used frequencies for cellular communication and infrastructure across the globe.
​​​
Migdal et al. found significant behavioral effects in honey bees seven days after exposure to this common cellular frequency, as well as less immediate dramatic effects within one hour of exposure.
​​
The researchers housed worker bees in wooden cages right after they emerged, and divided the bees into experimental groups, exposed to RF fields, and a control group not exposed to RF fields. The experimental group bees were exposed to 900 MHz electromagnetic fields of different intensities (intensities at 12 V/m, 28 V/m, and 61 V/m) and different durations of exposure (15 minutes, 1 hour and 3 hours), for a total of 9 experimental groups. The behavior of the bees was analyzed at two time points: immediately after exposure and seven days after exposure. Observed behaviors included flying, social interactions, walking, and self-grooming.
​​
"Significant effects were observed seven days after exposure
in walking, flight, and individual contact."​​​​
​
What does this mean about our own use of modern wireless devices? This is science on the possible contribution of wireless emissions to the recent struggles of the honey bee. It is hard to contemplate - but I would argue that it really shouldn't be a big surprise.
Biologists and entomologists have been sounding the alarm for years, even decades, about evidence that radiofrequency emissions from modern wireless and cellular technologies may be an emerging environmental pollutant impacting honey bee behaviors and in fact the behaviors of many pollinators and other insects.
​​
Last year Thill et al. (2024) reviewed 185 papers on the effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) on bees and other insects and 145 studies on insect magnetic sensing, and reported disturbing trends for both high frequency and low frequency EMFs. The findings of effects of exposure to high frequency (HF) EMFs, across 238 experiments, including decreased reproductive capacity, altered behavior, oxidative stress, DNA damage and impaired development. For low frequency (LF) EMFs (133 experiments), findings included behavioral effects, metabolic effects, and reproductive effects.
​
In 2023, Molina-Montenegro et al. found that honey bee pollination behaviors were significantly disturbed in the field in the presence of man-made radiofrequencey electromagnetic fields: "The presence of EMF under field conditions significantly impaired honeybees’ pollination services to plants following a putative molecular mechanism associated with behavioral and physiological stress... The organismal-level impacts translated into a lower number of floral visits that reduced seed production, which, in turn, lowered diversity and plant abundance."
In 2021 a review by A. Balmori described evidence of damage to pollinators caused by man-made electromagnetic radiation and suggested that this radiation should be considered seriously as a complementary driver for pollinator decline, acting in synergy with climate change, pesticides, agricultural intensification and invasive species.
​
In 2024 Migdał et al. assessed the nutrition levels in honey bees exposed to radiofrequency radiation and found that exposed bees showed signs of cellular starvation, even at exposure levels below current safety standards for humans. "Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields disturb honey bee nutrition. The changes may have long-term effects."
​
In 2021, Lupi et al. found that bees with exposure to both pesticides and electromagnetic fields were at increased risk of negative effects. ​
​​
But we need not limit ourselves to the past three or four years to find concerning scientific research on honey bees and man-made wireless radiation.
In 2010 Sharma and Kumar studied the effects of cell phone emissions on honey bee behavior by literally placing cell phones outside of two hives while leaving two other hives unexposed without cell phones. After simply turning on the cell phones for 15 minutes, twice a day between February and April, they observed the beginnings of colony decline, including significant drops in the queen's egg laying rates, and declines in the number of incoming foragers. Worker bees were observed having trouble returning to their hives, and large losses in worker bee numbers followed. After three months of the experiment, the exposed colonies had no honey or pollen reserves due to these behavioral changes. "There was neither honey nor pollen in the colony at the end of the experiment."
​​
In 2011, Favre et al. placed cell phones near five honeybee hives and took more than 80 sound recordings over five months with the phones sometimes off and sometimes on. They observed that when the cell phone was off the bees remained undisturbed, but when the cell phone was turned on, the bees began making sounds more frequently and intensely within 25 to 40 minutes of turning the phone on, resulting in the "worker piping signal" normally produced by bees as a signal of danger. The piping behaviors stopped once the phone was turned off, with a consistent and repeatable effect.​​​
​​
In 2010, Grölle et al. exposed honeybees to Dect cordless phones, and found that that exposed bees were less able to return to their hives within ordinary time frames.
​
In 2011, Kumar et al found that cell phone radiation influenced honey bees’ behavior and physiology.
​​
In 2011, S. Pattazhy published a case study on the impact of electromagnetic radiation on the density of honey bees.
​
In 2006, Harst et al. found decreased rates of egg laying and reducing colony strength after exposure to man-made radiofrequency fields.
​
In 2018, Sundar examined the relationship between Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) in honey bees and EMF radiation exposure.
2 Feb
2025
Tips for Reducing
Your
Radiofrequency
Footprint
​​​​​​
Eco-Friendly Approaches to Modern Connectivity
​​

You can reduce your wireless footprint without sacrificing your connection to the modern digital world. ​​Many wireless communication devices can connect via wired Ethernet cable. The use of wired Ethernet eliminates radiofrequency (RF) emissions between routers and various devices. This reduces the impact on ecosystems outside the walls of the home, since most modern routers emit far outdoors into the yard and beyond.
​​
Laptops, streaming devices, and security cameras can all be connected through wired cables, making wireless emissions unnecessary and redundant.
Ethernet cable can be particularly helpful for avoiding the high RF emissions involved in high data operations such as facetiming and video streaming.
​
If an Ethernet connection is not for you
It is still possible to minimize emissions, particularly for high data activities, if you aren't ready or able to switch out your wireless for a wired connection.
Radiofrequency (RF) output from most modern routers and streaming devices can be adjusted to lightning speed and luxurious reach, while not exceeding your actual needs in terms of reach and power. Most devices come with default settings to allow vastly higher power than most households require for their devices.
​
In addition to "lowering the volume" on your devices' RF output, you can also get into the habit of uploading wirelessly but consuming with the wireless OFF. Instead of watching while streaming, try initiating the upload of your movie or program and then placing the device in as far as possible from outdoor gardens or natural areas where birds, pollinators, and wildlife may be (at least 20 feet if possible). This way the emissions being projecting into the ecosystem are miminized. Once the media download is complete, switch to Airplane mode (with Bluetooth also disabled) while watching the movie or other content.
​
Reduce the number of antennas running 24/7 on your phone.
​
Did you know that most modern phones contain multiple antennas for different functions, all of which emit radiofrequency radiation for as long as the phone is on?
​​
Fortunately you can control how much emits from your phone, and when, by disabling antennas and unused apps temporarily or long-term. Most people aren’t using all antennas all of the time, so turning OFF the ones not in use will reduce unnecessary RF exposure. Some examples of individually controllable antennas include 4G and 4G+, 5G, Bluetooth, and cellular. I also disable navigation and GPS apps and find your phone apps to reduce my RF exposure.
​
To temporarily disable Bluetooth: Go into Settings and turn OFF your Bluetooth. Your Wi-Fi antennas will remain on including any 5G capabilities your phone is equipped with.
​
To disable 5G antennas while keeping cellular antennas on: If you aren’t using all of the antennas all the time, turn OFF the ones not in use. You don’t have to keep all of these on ALL the time. One easy way to accomplish this is to turn off several antennas overnight while you sleep, or turn off your phone completely. For example, you could leave the cellular antenna on, in case of emergency overnight, but turn all the other antennas off.
​​
Take the smart out of smart meters
​​
Most utility companies offer a non-smart option, i.e., a wireless-free electric or gas meter in the form of an "opt-out." This is perfect for customers interested in reducing their wireless footprint for environmental or health reasons.
​​
Want to take it to the next level?
​​
If you want to go the extra mile and become a wildlife warrior, consider speaking up within your community when it comes to cell tower placement near local wildlife habitats. Pay attention to plans for new cell towers and/or upgrades to existing cellular infrastructure in and your community. You can play a critical role in protecting ecosystems if you can identify and demand appropriate situation of wireless infrastructure to suit the environmental and ecosystem landscape in your area. ​
​​​​​
05 June
Radiofrequency
Radiation
and
Domestic Pets
​​​​​​
Constant Exposure to
Man-Made Wireless Emissions is an Emerging Environmental Stressor that Can Impact Domestic Pets
​

In March 2024, biologists in the academic
journal Frontiers in Veterinary Medicine published a ground-breaking scientific paper describing the negative health effects of wireless tracking and other wireless technologies on wildlife and domestic pets. ​
​
The researchers urged "more caution in the wildlife and veterinarian communities before such technologies are used."
​
View the full scientific publication.
​​​​
The researchers characterized tracking and other wireless device emissions as “radiation pollution” and described “negative physiological effects” to wildlife and domestic pets.
However, domestic pets have experienced dramatic increases in radiofrequency radiation exposure in the past decade. Since our pets live alongside us, their exposure to wireless radiation has grown steeply as the presence of human wireless devices in the home has increased. Smart TVs and phones, streaming devices, virtual assistants, and wireless laptops are all sources of radiofrequency radiation inside the home that can reach the living space of domestic pets.
​​​​​
In addition, modern cellular and wireless devices rely on a vast network of transmission towers and other infrastructure which emit radio frequency radiation day and night. As the numbers of cell towers increase, more residential homes are within close proximity, meaning that the cell tower emissions reach more of our pets.
​​
In July 2023, an expert panel of biologists and wildlife experts reported on the harmful impacts of cell tower radiation on mammals, birds, and wildlife: Ecosystem and Environmental Impacts of Cell Towers.
​​​​
Study co-author Dr. Blake Levitt stated that radio-frequency radiation from cell towers and cell phones caused harm in every animal model studied.​​
18 June
FCC Guidelines Do Not Address Safety Limits
for Small Animals
​​​​​​
Statute Includes Limits on
Human Absorption Only

​​​​​​​​​​​​
In 1996 the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted the recommendations of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) regarding human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields. These recommendations described suggested Maximum Permissible Exposure limits for field strength and power density for transmitters operating at frequencies of 300 kHz to 100 GHz.
The FCC also adopted the specific absorption rate (SAR) limits for devices operating within close proximity to the human body, as specified within the guidelines of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) (See ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992; Report and Order, FCC 96-326). For a detailed specification of the FCC's requirements, see Parts 1 and 2 of the FCC's Rules and Regulations [47 C.F.R. 1.1307(b), 1.1310, 2.1091, 2.1093].
​
However, missing are recommendations about RF effects on wildlife and domestic pets.
​
Environmental Effects Unexamined
​
In 2003, an Application for Review by the EMR Network was submitted, contesting the FCC’s decision on a petition for inquiry regarding environmental effects of radiofrequency radiation. The FCC denied the application for review.
(FCC No. 03-191): [PDF | Word ]
Commissioner Copps: [PDF | Word]
​
Radiofrequency “Exposure Circumstances” Classified as a Group 2B Possible Carcinogen in Humans
​
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) describes group 2B "substances, mixtures and exposure circumstances" as those that have been classified as "possibly carcinogenic to humans."
​
On May 31, 2011, the IARC classified radiofrequency (RF) fields as group 2B "possible carcinogens" to humans. There has been no specification as to the evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals or wildlife.
View the 2013 IARC publication Non-ionizing Radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields in: “IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans,” Volume 102: IARC Report on Carcinogenic Risk to Humans of RF.
​
View the Lancet Oncology summary of the IARC monograph as HTML or PDF.
​
View the IARC press release on its classification of RF as possibly carcinogenic to humans: Press release No 208, 31 May 2011, IARC classifies Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans.

FCC guidelines set limits on human absorption, but do not address safety limits for small animals.
Take Back Your Yard:
Improve the Electromagnetic Health of Your Yard or Garden
​​
Reducing man-made wireless emissions in your yard is a great way to create a safer habitat for butterflies, bees, birds, and frogs. Here are three easy ways to get started:
​
1. Unplug your router at night. Most modern router emissions extend far beyond the walls of the home, into the front and back yard, and often into other yards nearby. They emit radio-frequency (RF) radiation continuously, including overnight while not in use, as long as they are plugged in. Simply unplugging the router at night while you sleep will give nearby birds and pollinators a break overnight. Alternatively a simple timer can be attached to automatically power the router off and back on at designated times.
​​
2. Protect the outdoors from your smart utility meter. Residential and commercial smart meters emit pulsed RF radiation into the yard outside. These emission then reach birds that may be nesting close by, as well as migratory birds and wildlife passing through. Because smart meters gather household energy data for real-time analysis, they emit frequent bursts of RF radiation 24/7, meaning that sensitive outdoor species are exposed night and day to the emissions. One great way to protect the many species in your yard is to place a metal mesh cover over your meter. Commercial covers are designed to allow meter readings while still blocking most background meter emissions.
​​
3. Wire up. The best way to eliminate outdoor radio-frequency radiation is to "Ethernet your internet." This means wiring up your internet connection by using Ethernet cables to connect laptops and other devices to the Ethernet port on your router. Wired connections were originally the default for home computing, and are used today by many government agencies, medical centers and professional gamers seeking to optimize speed and security. In 2024 a number of TV sticks and other streaming devices were released with Ethernet on/off switches for customers desiring wired connections. ​


Go Offline When You Enjoy the Outdoors
Power Down or Use Airplane Mode​
​​​
Try unplugging during walks on nature trails and in parks. Experiment with how it feels to listen to nature without streaming music or scrolling news. Birds and wildlife nearby may be in the line of fire when our cell phones and wireless devices transmit to nearby cell towers. Maybe people are surprised to learn that their cell phones are emitting constantly even when they are not actively on a phone call or texting, due to the large number of background apps and navigation calculations that are constantly active on modern phones. Many phones are constantly scanning for 5G, 4G, 3G, bluetooth, and GPS even when the phone is not being used. This means that delicate birds and wildlife between you and the nearest cell tower are receiving the phone's radiofrequency emissions constantly when you are outdoors simply trying to enjoy your time with them.
​
A great way to further reduce your electronic footprint while outdoors is to encourage your hiking companions, birding group members, and other nature lovers to place their cellphones on airplane or turn them completely off. Airplane mode often only deactivates a fraction of wireless emissions, while allowing frequencies that don't conflict with air travel frequencies. This means that turning the phone completely off for that outdoor walk is the best choice.


Regulatory Statute 47 U.S. Code §332
Express Omission of Environmental Effects

There has been at least one legal challenge ​
to regulatory statute 47 U.S. Code §332, which expressly prohibits consideration of environmental impacts when making decisions about new cell tower placement. In Santa Fe Alliance for Public Health and Safety v. City of Santa Fe, the court was asked to examine whether a particular provision which references environmental effects, i.e., 47 U.S. Code §332(c)(7)(B)(iv), violates petitioners' First Amendment rights to petition the government by pursuing claims in court.
​
The provision, also referred to as Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, provides that “[n]o State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and
modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the [Federal Communications] Commission’s
regulations concerning such emissions.” 47 U.S.C.332(c)(7)(B)(iv).
​
The judgment of the court of appeals was entered on March 30, 2021. A petition for rehearing was denied on May 27, 2021 (Pet. App. 37-38). The petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on October 25, 2021.
The questions presented are as follows:
1. Whether Section 704 violates petitioners’ First Amendment right to petition the government by pursuing claims in court.
2. Whether the term “environmental effects" in Section 704
includes effects on human health.


A great way to get involved is to oppose the placement of cell towers in your community's parks and natural wildlife habitats.
​​​
The story of Amazon Creek in Eugene, Oregon is the story of simple steps that neighbors in a small community took to protect threatened and endangered species from wireless infrastructure and emissions. Amazon Creek is a protected nature area, implemented for biodiversity conservation and habitat protection.
​​​
An application for installation of a 75-foot cell tower was submitted by a major telecommunications company in 2013 on a church property located next to the Amazon Creek protected nature area.
​​
The cellular provider erecting the tower was required to notify neighbors residing within 500 feet of the proposed tower, but community members expressed concern that no notices were mailed. There was only one report of a singular utility pole displaying a 8.5 x 11 inch poster about the proposed tower.
​
A meeting was organized at the church to discuss the planned tower. A nearby resident read about the meeting in the newspaper and decided to raise awareness about the meeting by placing fliers under the doormats at 200 of her neighbors' homes. When the meeting was held to discuss the planned cell tower, the church was filled with concerned neighbors and residents. Expert testimony in opposition to the tower's construction was heard before the City Planning Department. More at ElectronicSilentSpring.com. ​​
Enlist the Help of Your School Board in Protecting the Ecosystems Near Schools ​​
​​
Cell towers on school campuses impact vast ecosystems because the radio-frequency emissions reach outward in a radius of one to 25 miles depending on the frequency, network capacity, and geographical landscape. This means that birds and wildlife are affected in any surrounding parks, forests, and gardens within many miles of the school.
​
By working with your local school board, you may be able to block the placement of cell towers on campus at your child's school.
​​​
A recent success story involves the grassroots Pittsfield Cell Tower Concerned Citizens who objected to the building of four cell towers on and near their children's school campus.
Addressing the school board on July 23, 2024, parent Maryam Esfarjani expressed her concerns about reliance on outdated studies on electromagnetic radiation, as well as lack on longitudinal studies looking into the long-term health and environmental impacts of radiofrequency exposure over many years or decades. She requested that the tower construction be halted at least until the FCC testifies in a federal court case, as it was ordered to do, about whether it ignored scientific evidence showing environmental as well as human harm from wireless radiation.
​​
“We respectfully request that no cell towers be built on LCPS schools
until the FCC has responded to the federal court.”
- Parent Maryam Esfarjani
​​
The work of Esfarjani and other parents paid off on August 1, 2024, when the Mayor of Point Pleasant Beach in Pittsburgh announced that attorneys for the borough had notified the cellular company installing four cell towers on and near school campuses that the towers must be taken down. ​

​​​​How Can I Protect My Pet?
Small Changes, Big Impacts
​
​
​
​​
Closer proximity to wireless devices has been correlated with higher risk of negative health effects. This means that allowing your pet some distance from wireless devices is important for reducing their risk for negative impacts. Even small changes can substantially improve a pet’s electromagnetic environment environment – with minimal inconvenience to humans.
​
For example, how close is your pet’s bed to your wireless router? Is it in the same room or same side of the house? Moving the pet's bed to a different area of the house, or moving the router, can reduce the pet's radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure dramatically.​​
​

Consider a corded landline phone for home use.

A domestic cat's brain is smaller than a human's and may more easily absorb wireless frequencies.
​​​​
3 Steps to Unplug for Your Pets:
Here are three easy ways to clean up your pet's electrical environment by reducing their wireless radiation exposure.
Pull the Plug: Give your pet's body a break, particularly during critical sleep time, by physically unplugging routers from the wall, or attaching automatic timers. This is especially important if your signal at home tends to be weak, because devices emit higher levels or radiofrequency radiation if they have to search to get a good connection. Most modern devices will continue searching all night, even when not in use.
​​​​
Access to Lo-Fi: You can create a safe space for your pets by keeping streaming devices and routers in a different room from their sleeping space. Does your dog or cat like to watch movies with you or lay on your laptop to get your attention? Try uploading movies first and then putting the device on airplane. Did you know that most modern phones contain multiple antennas for different functions, all of which are emitting radiofrequency radiation as long as your phone is on? Do your pet a favor and turn OFF the antennas not in use. Most people aren’t using all of the antennas at all times. Try selectively disabling specific antennas you aren't using. For example, you can go into Settings and turn OFF your Bluetooth temporarily, while keeping your Wi-Fi antenna on and your separate 5G antenna on. Or you can turn off your 5G antenna while keeping your cellular antenna on. One easy way to accomplish this is to turn off several antennas overnight while you sleep, or turn off your phone completely. For example, you could leave the cellular antenna on, in case of emergency overnight, but turn all the other antennas off.
​​​​​​
Wire Up: Eliminating wireless emissions has become easier as many modern devices now come equipped with "wired" options such as on/off Ethernet connections. Use of an Ethernet cable, particularly for high data operations such as facetiming and streaming videos, is ideal because it eliminates RF emissions entirely. If you don’t have an Ethernet connection yet, you can still minimize these high data activities around your pet. Try uploading while at a safe distance from your pet (at least 10 feet), and then use Airplane mode while watching the movie or other content with your pet. Ideally Bluetooth should also be disabled while spending time near your pet. ​​
​

Wire up: Switch out your wireless connection for an Ethernet-cabled connection.​
​​​​​​
If you don’t have an Ethernet connection yet, you can still minimize high data activities around your pet. A good workaround for streaming is to upload while at a safe distance from your pet (at least 10 feet), and then using Airplane mode (with Bluetooth also disabled) to view the upload while in the same room with your pet.
​
In 2024, several major tech companies launched streaming devices and routers with user-friendly wired options as an alternative to wireless.
​
It may be easier to simply turn off your phone at home if you have a corded landline phone as a backup. With a corded landline, family members may feel more comfortable powering down all cell phones overnight. ​​
​

Upload content first, then use Airplane mode when viewing alongside your pet.

Contact Your Congressional Representatives
​​
Is there a park, migratory route, or protected wildlife area in or near your community?
​​
For protection of birds, wildlife, and ecosystems from harmful radiofrequency emissions, no cell towers should be erected within 500 feet of parks, protected land, habitats and sanctuaries.
​​​​
However, many citizens are surprised to learn that state and local regulation of cell tower placement is expressly prohibited on the basis of environmental concerns.
​​​​​
The current regulatory statute in the U.S. Code expressly prohibits consideration of environmental impact when placing new cell towers, as long as the towers meet federal compliance through the FCC.
​
"No State or local government
or instrumentality thereof
may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects
of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the [Federal Communications] Commission's regulations concerning such emissions."
47 U.S. Code § 332(c)(7)(B))(iv)
​​
Let your Congressional representatives know that you believe local environmental concerns should be allowed as a basis for opposing the new cell tower placement.

Protect Your Right to Vote on Cell Tower Placement
​
A California City Park Succeeds in Protecting
Voter Approval Requirement Before Erecting Cell Tower
​​
The City of Huntington Beach, California used the legal system to protect voter rights in its city. The City informed a cellular carrier that it must obtain approval from city voters before leasing city park property for placement of a new cell tower. This voter approval requirement was possible under a section of an existing city charter known as "Measure C" that laid out voter rights regarding proposed development projects on Huntington Beach city property.
​​​
The cellular company argued that voter approval was unnecessary because the voter approval requirement was preempted by the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
​​
The disagreement was decided by the Ninth Circuit court, which found that voter approval was in fact required before constructing a cell tower on city-owned park property, under the city's Measure C requirement.
​​
"The panel held that the Telecommunications Act of 1996
did not preempt the City of Huntington Beach’s decision
to require a company to obtain voter approval
before constructing a mobile telephone antenna
on city-owned park property."
​​
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2013/12/11/10-56877%20web_a.pdf


